However, comma, this doesn't mean that I'm in favor of violating copyrights, author's rights, or taking money out of the pockets of hard-working artists.

I do have sympathy with this and I think the question of negotiation of meaning and ownership between print fiction writers and fan fiction writers who wish to play in the same ball park (or one located close by) is a complex and difficult one. Certainly, fan fiction writers must negotiate boundaries and respect each other as well.

However, in terms of television and film I have no sympathy because the ball parks are located so far away in public space and are so different in terms of money, status, and cultural reach. Good and successful fan fiction does not threaten either the earning power or the cultural value of a film or television property. In fact, fan fiction supports, promotes and potentially increases the value of that property.

But then, the Hollywood folks ---at least the smart ones --have figured this out already.

In MFU, for example, Norman Felton who still owns half the property, has never objected to any fan activities and was even a guest at our conventions. He knows there are zines out there and he's never had a problem with that.