Date: 2004-04-04 08:04 pm (UTC)
<>What I would object to is an estate holding a copyright indefinitely past the creator's lifetime, as corporations like Disney would prefer.

Yes. I would actually prefer to see copyright limited to creator's-lifetime plus, say, 50 years (it's 75 now). That seems to me sufficient time for the spouse and kids to mine the artist's work. But I really think that anything printed more than a hundred years ago should move into the public domain.

Neil's story is getting a lot of buzz. It's very good--it's Neil, after all--but I think I figured out the twist a little too soon to really get the proper effect. I'm still working my way through the book slowly.

And media-based fanfic, or vids (I've seen some of yours, by the way, and they're very good), or other fan endeavors--I don't see that it hurts anybody. If anything, it may drum up interest for lesser-known properties, or keep them alive past their normal expiration date.

Our legends and archetypes play out in the popular media rather than in ballads and tales. It's a long-standing tradition to engage other work in dialogue. I'd go so far as to say it's part of how the brain thinks, actually.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

przed: (Default)
przed

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223 2425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 09:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios